The Notaries Continuity In The Constitutional Court Decision Number 84 Of 2024

Khansa Hurruzia

doi:10.55227/ijhess.v5i5.1553

Authors

Khansa Hurruzia Padjadjaran University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v5i5.1553

Abstract

The Law Number 2 of 2014 relating to the Office of Notary (UUJN) contains the rights and obligations of the Notaries as public officials who have important authority to make authentic deeds and keep legal documents that have legal evidentiary power. On the other hand, Notaries also have rights including the authority to make authentic deeds, maintain the confidentiality of client data, and obtain legal protection. Legal protection is the most important thing for notaries in carrying out their duties and functions in the community. However, this legal protection is restricted by a fairly short age limit for Notaries in carrying out their role as a public official. In response to this, a judicial review was submitted through the Constitutional Court regarding the age limit issue. This fact raises the issue: why is it necessary to extend the retirement age limit for Notaries in Indonesia and to what extent this age limit can provide legal protection for Notaries. This research is a normative juridical research with qualitative data that emphasizes secondary data through the application of norms, rules in positive law, and statutory approaches. The research results show that: First, the extension of the retirement age limit for Notaries in Indonesia is needed to maximize the function of Notaries so that they have more time to fulfill the necessities of their life and carry out their functions in society; Secondly, the age limit can provide a longer period of statutory legal protection for Notary to perform their duties and functions in the community, improving the livelihood of themselves, their children, wives and families through their role in the Indonesian legal repertoire.

References

Defega, Z. D. (2025). URGENSI PERPANJANGAN MASA JABATAN NOTARIS DI INDONESIA DIKAITKAN DENGAN PRINSIP RASIONALITAS. Ensiklopedia Of Journal URGENSI, 7(3), 356–366.

Irwansyah. (2021). Penelitian Hukum: Pilihan Metode & Praktik Penulisan Artikel (4th ed.). mirra buana media. https://catalog.danlevlibrary.net/index.php?p=show_detail&id=20724

Kholidah, Hasibuan, P. H., Alamsyah, M. R., Ramadani, A. F., & Keramat, A. (2024). Notaris dan PPAT di Indonesia: aplikasi teori dan praktik dalam pembuatan akta. Semesta Aksara. https://repo.uinsyahada.ac.id/1538/

Malik, P., Sampara, S., & Qamar, N. (2020). Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Nomor 35 PUU-XVI/2018 Tentang Organisasi Advokat. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:234394442

Purba, C. J. F. X., Ikhwansyah, I., & Wahjuni, S. (2024). TERCAPAINYA KETERTIBAN UMUM. VERITAS: Jurnal Program Pascasarjana Ilmu HUkum Universitas Islam As-Syafi’iyah, 10(1), 68–80.

Retno Damayanti. (2024). Tinjauan Yuridis terhadap Hak dan Kewajiban Notaris dalam Era Digitalisasi: Analisis Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 dan Regulasi Tambahan. Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum, 5(3), 1242–1249.

Supriyadi, S., & Handoko, W. (2023). Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Notaris Selaku Pejabat Formal. Notarius, 16(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v16i1.39498

The 1945 Constitution of Republic of Indonesia.

The Civil Law Code of Republic of Indonesia.

The Constitutional Court Decision of Republic of Indonesia Number 84/PUU-XXII/2024.

The Law Number 30 Year 2004 concerning Notary Position.

The Law Number 2 of 2014 Concerning the Amendment to Law Number 30 of 2004 Concerning the Position of Notary.

The Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia Number 19 of 2019 concerning Procedures for Appointment, Leave, Transfer, Dismissal, and Extension of the Term of Office of Notaries.

Asfari Syukran An’Umillah. (2023). Tanggung Jawab Notaris Setelah Berakhir Masa Jabatan Terhadap Protokol Notaris (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Pontianak Nomor: 119/ Pdt.G/ 2013/ Pn.Ptk), Jurnal Unes Law Review, 6, (1), 705. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.

Melania Santa Inne Nanjong. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Notaris/ PPAT yang Berindikasi Melakukan Perbuatan Pidana (Studi Kausus Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 310 K/Pid.Sus/2022), Jurnal Unes Law Review, 6, (2), 6315. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.

Musarofah dan F.X. Arsin Lukman. (2023). Kajian Hukum Notaris Pensiun Yang Belum Menyerahkan Protokol Notaris Kepada Notaris Pemegang Protokol Studi Kasus Notaris Pensiun Di Jakarta. Imanot: Jurnal Kemahasiswaan Hukum & Kenotariatan, 5, (2), 713.

Peter M. M., (2016), Penelitian Hukum. Cetakan 11, Jakarta: PT. Khrisma Putra Utama.