Limits On Freedom Of The Press In A Democratic State: Between The Press Law And The Ite Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v5i5.2150Keywords:
freedom of the press, democratic rule of law, Press Law, EIT Law, legal protection.Abstract
Freedom of the press constitutes one of the essential pillars of a democratic state governed by the rule of law, as it plays a crucial role in social oversight, information dissemination, the formation of public opinion, and political education of citizens. A free and responsible press is therefore a fundamental prerequisite for the realization of transparent and accountable governance. Nevertheless, press freedom cannot be interpreted as an absolute or unlimited right. Within constitutional practice, such freedom remains subject to legal restrictions intended to safeguard the public interest, maintain social order, and ensure respect for the rights and reputations of individuals. In Indonesia, guarantees of press freedom are specifically regulated under Law Number 40 of 1999 on the Press, which affirms the principles of press independence, media autonomy, and dispute resolution mechanisms through the right of reply and the role of the Press Council. However, rapid developments in information and communication technology have expanded journalistic activities into the digital sphere, causing press products to intersect with Law Number 11 of 2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions, as amended. This situation has given rise to a dual regulatory framework that frequently generates legal debate, particularly when journalistic works are alleged to violate criminal provisions under the EIT Law. The application of the EIT Law to press activities potentially creates normative conflicts and raises concerns regarding the criminalization of journalism, which may undermine freedom of expression. Accordingly, this article aims to examine the limits of press freedom within the framework of a democratic rule-of-law state and to analyze the relationship, distinctions, and potential normative conflicts between the Press Law and the EIT Law. This analysis is expected to offer an academic contribution toward formulating a model of press freedom regulation that is proportional, equitable, and consistent with democratic principles and the protection of human rights.
References
Aisyah, S., Muflihah, I., Khoirunnisa, A. N., & Septian, F. (2025). Peran Hukum Dalam Menjamin Kebebasan Pers: Tinjauan Terhadap Uu Ite Dan Ancaman Bagi Demokrasi Di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 10(2).
Alhakim, A. (2022). Urgensi Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Jurnalis dari Risiko Kriminalisasi UU Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik di Indonesia. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 4(1), 89–106.
Asrun, A. M. (2016). Hak asasi manusia dalam kerangka cita negara hukum. Jurnal Cita Hukum, Fakultas Syariah Dan Hukum UIN, 4(1), 133–154. https://doi.org/10.15408/jch.v4i1.3200
Bukamo, M. (2021). Pers Sebagai Pilar Keempat Demokrasi Ditinjau Dari Konsep Kebebasan John Stuart Mill (Vol. 26, Issue 3). (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Gadjah Mada).
Collins, J. S. (2021). Pers Sebagai Pilar Demokrasi dalam Perspektif Islam. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 2(2), 142–173.
Djulhijjah, A. S., & Kencono, P. S. (2024). Kebebasan Pers Dalam Penyampaian Berita Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 1999 Tentang Pers. Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice Volume:, 2(1), 1–18.
Dzhnii, O. R., Lestari, P., Yana, A. P., & Lestarika, D. P. (2025). Urgensi Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Jurnalis dari Risiko Kriminalisasi Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Dan Kewarganegaraan, 15(11). https://doi.org/Prefix doi.org/10.3783/causa.v2i9.2461
Fuqoha, Firdausi, I. A., & Sanjaya, A. E. (2019). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Intervensi Pemberitaan dalam Kerangka Kemerdekaan Pers Nasional. AJUDIKASI : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 3(1), 75–92.
Hadi, F. (2022). Negara Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia Di Indonesia. Wijaya Putra Law Review, 1(2), 170–188.
Haqqullah, M. W., & Safira, U. (2025). Analisis Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 1999 Terhadap Independensi Kebebasan Pers Pada Kasus Jurnalis Tempo. Journal of Constitutional Law and Governance, 5(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/0.19105/asshahifah.v5i1.19454
Lim, M. (2013). Many Clicks but Little Sticks: Social Media Activism in Indonesia. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 43(4), 636–657. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2013.769386
Mas’ud, F., Jeluhur, H., Negat, K., Tefa, A., Uly, M., & Amtiran, M. (2025). Etika Dalam Media Sosial Antara Kebebasan Ekspresi Dan Tanggung Jawab Digital. JIMMI: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Multidisiplin, 2(2), 235–246.
Nugroho, Y., Putri, D. A., & Laksmi, S. (2013). Mapping the landscape of the media industry in contemporary Indonesia. Creative Commons.
Oktafia, D., & Ariyani, N. (2020). Model Pelindungan Hukum Terhadap Justice Collaborator Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia ∗. 27(2), 328–344. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol27.iss2.art6
Rahayu, D. P., & Sulaiman. (2020). Metode penelitian hukum. Yogyakarta : Penerbit Thafa Media.
Ramadhan, G. B. (2025). Eksistensi Perjanjian Klausula Arbitrase Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Ditinjau Dari Asas Pacta Sunt Servanda Dan Asas Lex Specialis Derogate Legi Generalis. (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang).
Ramajayadi, G., Janna, R., & Putriyana, A. (2025). Kebebasan Pers Dan Pencegahan Ujaran Kebencian : Telaah Yuridis Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 1999 Tentang Pers. Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan, 1(4), 572–576.
Repansah, M. (2024). Penerapan Sistem Demokrasi Konstitusional : Indikator dan Hambatan dalam Ketatanegaraan Indonesia Henry B Mayo dalam bukunya Introduction to Democratic menjabarkan pengertian sistem politik yang demokratis sebagai suatu pemerintahan dimana golongan yang m. Jurnal Hukum Kenegaraan Dan Politik Islam, 4(2), 329–351.
Risman, H., Rahim, A., & Rohmah, S. N. (2022). Batas Kebebasan Pers dan Hatespeech di Indonesia Dalam Demokrasi dan Fiqh Siyasah. Mizan: Journal of Islamic Law. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:272643733
Situmeang, A., Elan, & Girsang, J. (2022). Efektivitas Undang-Undang ITE dalam menangani ujaran kebencian melalui media sosial di Kota Batam. Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Undiksha, 10(3), 83–100.
Tambunan, A. S. E., Mulyadi, M., & Lubis, R. (2025). Penerapan Asas Lex Specialis Systematische Derogat Legi Generali Dalam Penanganan Kasus Korupsi Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Dalam Pemberian Izin Tambang Nikel (STUDI PUTUSAN NO. 118/PID. SUS-TPK/2023/PN JKT PST). Jurnal Hukum Statuta, 4(3), 159–178.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 M. Riyanto

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.








































