Digital Contract Disputes in the FinTech Era: Legal Analysis of Consumer Protection and the Obligations of the Parties

Authors

  • Rusdi Sanmas Universitas Dharma Indonesia
  • Markus Suryoutomo Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang
  • Arliyanda Arliyanda Universitas Indonesia Timur
  • Johannes Triestanto Universitas Katolik Parahyangan Bandung
  • Iwan Rasiwan Universitas Kartamulia Purwakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v5i5.2153

Keywords:

FinTech, digital contracts, consumer protection, disputes, party obligations.

Abstract

The rapid development of the Financial Technology (FinTech) industry has significantly transformed the delivery of financial services, including the execution of contracts in electronic form. Digital contracts offer greater efficiency, transparency, and accessibility for the public. However, these practices also present complex legal challenges, particularly regarding consumer protection and the obligations of the parties involved. Many digital contracts still rely on standardized, one-sided clauses that may disadvantage consumers, while FinTech providers often limit their legal liability. Existing regulations, such as Law No. 11 of 2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE Law) and Law No. 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection (UUPK), provide a normative legal framework to ensure the validity of digital contracts and safeguard consumer rights. Nevertheless, implementation in practice faces obstacles, including issues with verifying electronic signatures, clarity of contractual clauses, and the effectiveness of dispute resolution mechanisms. This study employs a normative juridical approach to analyze disputes in FinTech digital contracts in Indonesia, emphasizing the need for balance between the rights and obligations of all parties. The findings suggest a necessity for regulatory harmonization, improved legal and digital literacy among consumers, and the development of adaptive dispute resolution mechanisms, including faster and more efficient online dispute resolution alternatives. These efforts are expected to enhance legal certainty, foster consumer trust, and reduce the risk of disputes in the continually evolving FinTech landscape.

References

Alamsyah, G. N., Hamzah, I. F., & Umar, W. (2024). Analisis Hukum Terhadap Keabsahan Klausula Baku dalam Kontrak Financial Technology ( Fintech ). Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora Dan Politik (JIHHP), 5(2), 955–971.

Aldaufa, A. F., & Naza, M. A. (2025). Integrasi Keadilan Kontraktual Dan Perlindungan Data Pribadi Dalam Perjanjian Perjanjian Fintech Peer To Peer Lending. El-Dusturie:Jurnal Hukum Dan Perundang-Undangan, 4(2), 194–210.

Amiroh, F., Hamzah, & Rohaini. (2025). Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Jasa Keuangan Melalui LAPS-SJK : Perspektif Perlindungan Konsumen. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Hukum, 3(6), 8853–8861.

Annisa, I. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum bagi Pemberi Pinjaman terhadap Klausula Baku dalam Perjanjian Layanan Peer-to-Peer Lending ( Studi Kasus Layanan Peer to Peer Lending Asetku ). Lex Renaissance, 3(7), 491–509.

Arner, D. W., Barberis, J., Buckley, R. P., Arnott, R. D., & Aronson, T. R. (2017). FinTech and RegTech in a Nutshell. CFA Institute Research Foundation.

Asmana, N. A. P., Ramandhani, A. N., & Agnesia, R. (2025). Kontrak Elektronik dalam Bisnis Online : Kajian terhadap Bentuk , Keabsahan , dan Perlindungan Hukum bagi Para Pihak. Studia: Journal of Humanities and Education Studies, 1(2), 201–210.

Aswan. (2024). Penyelesaian Sengketa Pinjaman Online Melalui Mediasi. Jembatan Hukum: Kajian Ilmu Hukum, Sosial Dan Administrasi Negara, 1(4).

Basani, C. S., Saptana, D., & Suhardini, E. D. (2025). Kecakapan Pihak yang Melakukan Kontrak Digital Melalui Pembelian Online dan Pihak yang Dapat Dimintai Pertanggungjawaban atas Barang yang Sudah Dibeli Menurut Peraturan Perundang-Undangan di Indonesia. Journal of Contemporary Law Studies Volume:, 2(3), 185–194.

Febrian, Saputra, I. Y., & Napitupulu, D. R. W. (2025). Implikasi Hukum terhadap Perlindungan Data Pribadi dalam Transaksi Fintech. Jurnal Komunikasi Dan Informasi Hukum, 4(1), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.56211/rechtsnormen.v4i1.1153

Fenwick, M., Mccahery, J. A., & Vermeulen, E. P. M. (2019). The End of ‘ Corporate ’ Governance : Hello ‘ Platform ’ Governance. European Business Organization Law Review, 20(1), 171–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40804-019-00137-z

Hatibie, H. S. (2025). Revolusi Penyelesaian Sengketa Digital : Transformasi Sistem Peradilan Melalui Online Dispute Resolution di Era Ekonomi Digital. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Hukum, 3(6), 9920–9934.

Katsh, E., & Rabinovich-Einy, O. (2017). Digital Justice: Technology and the Internet of Disputes. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190464585.001.0001

Lusardi, A., & Mitchell, O. S. (2013). The economic importance of financial literacy: Theory and evidence. Journal of Economic Literature. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.52.1.5

Priliasari, O. E. (2019). Pentingnya perlindungan data pribadi dalam transaksi pinjaman online. Majalah Hukum Nasional, 49(2), 1–188.

Putra, I. S., Santoso, B., Benuf, K., Hukum, M. I., Hukum, F., & Diponegoro, U. (2020). Online Dispute Resolution sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Financial Technology di Indonesia. Simbur Cahaya, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.28946/sc.v27i2.1035

Putri, N. K. P. K., & Yoga, I. G. P. (2025). Analisis Yuridis Tanggung Jawab Platform Digital Terkait Kerugian yang Diderita oleh Pengguna dalam Layanan Kontrak Cerdas. Jurnal Media Akademik (JMA), 3(12), 1–17.

Saebani, D. A. (2023). Metode Penelitian Hukum Pendekatan Yuridis Normatif. Bandung : CV PUSTAKA SETIA.

Saifullah, A., Adhyputra, M. F., & Fikri, Z. (2024). Implikasi Klausula Eksonerasi terhadap Perlindungan Konsumen dalam Kontrak Financial Technology Peer-to-Peer Lending. Jurnal Restorasi Hukum, 7(1), 236–256.

Sari, A. G., Sudarmanto, H. L., & Kusumaningrum, D. (2022). Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) Wujud Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Fintech di Indonesia. Transparansi Hukum, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.30737/transparansi.v5i1.2268

Sulaiman, S., Bego, K. C., Tiara, D., Pratama, D., & Yulinda, K. (2025). Analisis Hukum Perdata Terhadap Klausula Baku Dalam Kontrak Jasa Pinjaman Online ( Fintech Lending). Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains, 8(9), 5874–5881. https://doi.org/10.56338/jks.v8i10.8671

Syarifa, R., Rahmawati, L., Andini, P. F., Simanjuntak, M., Maria, A., Anggraini, T., Keluarga, I., Manusia, F. E., Perlindungan, B., & Nasional, K. (2022). Menyelisik Isu Perlindungan konsumen pada Klausula Eksonerasi Di sektor Jasa Keuangan Dan Retail dengan Pendekatan Mixed Methods. Jurnal Ilmu Keluarga Dan Konsumen, 15(2), 178–191.

Ulya, W. (2022). Perlindungan Konsumen Dalam Perkembangan Financial Technology Di Indonesia. Perwira Journal of Economics and Business (PJEB), 2(1), 31–45.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-17

How to Cite

Rusdi Sanmas, Markus Suryoutomo, Arliyanda Arliyanda, Johannes Triestanto, & Iwan Rasiwan. (2026). Digital Contract Disputes in the FinTech Era: Legal Analysis of Consumer Protection and the Obligations of the Parties. International Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences (IJHESS), 5(5). https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v5i5.2153

Issue

Section

Social Science