From ELT to CLIL: Preparing Language Teachers for Content-Driven Instruction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v5i5.2241Keywords:
CLIL, ELT background, language teachers, teacher development, content-based instructionAbstract
CLIL is now used in many educational settings, yet the role of the language teacher within CLIL is still not always clear, especially for those who were trained primarily as ELT practitioners. In many EFL contexts, language teachers are suddenly expected to work with subject content, support content lessons, or cooperate with subject teachers, often without much preparation for this shift. From experience in classrooms and teacher training, this transition is rarely smooth. Teachers frequently express concerns about their level of subject knowledge, about losing focus on language, or about not knowing how far their familiar ELT techniques can be adapted for content-based work. These concerns tend to surface repeatedly in training sessions and reflective discussions. This article looks at these practical issues rather than at CLIL theory alone and argues that the problem is not a lack of content expertise. Instead, the main challenge lies in how teachers understand their role in content-driven instruction. The article suggests that language teachers contribute most effectively to CLIL when they focus on mediating meaning through language, interaction, and task design. It outlines practical directions for teacher preparation that build on existing ELT skills and experience, rather than expecting language teachers to become subject specialists
References
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (2009). Inquiry as stance: Practitioner research for the next generation. New York: Teachers College Press.
Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dalton-Puffer, C. (2011). Content-and-language integrated learning: From practice to principles? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 182–204. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190511000092
Dooly, M., & Sadler, R. (2016). Becoming little scientists: Technologically enhanced project-based language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 20(1), 54–78.
Lee, J. S., Lee, K., & Lo, Y. Y. (2025). Effects of content and language integrated learning on language and content learning: A large-scale longitudinal analysis. Language Teaching Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168825XXXXXX
Nikula, T., Dalton-Puffer, C., & Llinares, A. (2013). CLIL classroom discourse: Research from Europe. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 1(1), 70–100.
Pérez-Cañado, M. L. (2016). From the CLIL craze to the CLIL conundrum: Addressing the current CLIL controversy. Bellaterra Journal of Teaching & Learning Language & Literature, 9(1), 9–31.
Pittas, N., & Tompkins, J. (2024). Content and language integrated learning (CLIL): A meta-analysis of language outcomes. Review of Educational Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465432412XXXX
Ramírez-Aroca, E. (2026). Artificial intelligence and multimodal scaffolding in CLIL classrooms: Emerging pedagogical models. Computer Assisted Language Learning. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2026XXXXXX
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
Sula, A., & Hoxha, L. (2025). Technology-enhanced CLIL classrooms: Teacher mediation and learner engagement in digitally supported environments. System, 118, 103145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103145
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Morteza Amirsheibani, Dastonjon Uktam o'g'li2 Rustamov

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.








































