Phonemic Hermeneutics of Eschatological Intonation in Sūrat Al-Qiyāmah Recitation

Authors

  • Ahid Ilham Zulfiqar UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung
  • Diyan Rifky Ramdhani UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung
  • Lina Marlina UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v6i1.2418

Keywords:

Al-Qiyāmah, eschatological intonation, Misyārī Rāsyid al-‘Afāsī, phonemic hermeneutics, Qur’anic recitation

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the eschatological pitch movements in Misyārī Rāsyid al-‘Afāsī’s recitation of Sūrat Al-Qiyāmah and to interpret their semantic-pragmatic meanings through al-‘Ani’s pitch-level framework. Using a descriptive qualitative phonemic approach, this study examines twenty-nine eschatological verses selected from Sūrat Al-Qiyāmah based on classical exegetical boundaries. The primary data were obtained from al-‘Afāsī’s murattal audio recitation, while the semantic baseline was established through six authoritative tafsir works. Data were collected through repeated listening, note-taking, pitch-pattern classification, and digital pitch-contour visualization. The analysis applied Nasution’s five-category pitch typology and al-‘Ani’s four-level pitch notation. The findings show that falling pitch dominates the corpus, appearing in 41.4% of the verses, followed by falling-rising pitch at 31.0%, rising-falling pitch at 17.2%, rising pitch at 6.9%, and flat pitch at 3.4%. The application of al-‘Ani’s framework indicates that 37.9% of the data show semantic-pragmatic congruence, 13.8% show incongruence, and 48.3% remain undetermined due to the complexity of Qur’anic illocutionary functions. The most significant finding appears in Q. 75:40, where an interrogative construction is recited with falling pitch to encode absolute theological affirmation. This study proposes the concept of phonemic hermeneutics, namely the interpretive function of pitch in Qur’anic recitation. The findings contribute to Arabic prosody, Qur’anic phonology, and taḥsīn pedagogy by showing that intonation is not merely vocal ornamentation, but a semantic-pragmatic device that supports meaning-conscious recitation.

References

Al-Hajeid, A. A., Pandian, A., & Al-Sohbani, Y. A. (2022). An investigation of rhythm in the subject matters of the Holy Quran. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 5(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2022.5.3.1

Al-Maḥallī, J., & Al-Suyūṭī, J. (n.d.). Tafsīr al-Jalālayn. CV Pustaka Assalam.

Al-Smadi, O. (2022). Challenges in translating rhetorical questions in the Holy Qur’an: A comparative study. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 12(5), 1003–1013. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1205.22

Al-Ṭabarī, I. J. (1995). Tafsīr al-Ṭabarī: Jāmiʿ al-bayān ʿan taʾwīl āy al-Qurʾān. Dār al-Fikr.

Al-Zuḥaylī, W. (1996). Tafsīr al-wajīz ʿalā hāmish al-Qurʾān al-ʿaẓīm. Dār al-Fikr.

Ali, Z. A. (2020). Intonational patterns of the speech act types in Sura Al-Ghashiyah: An autosegmental-metrical analysis. PalArch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 17(9), 7323–7339.

Alqadasi, Y. M., Alduais, A. M. S., & Alqadasi, A. M. (2024). Improving automatic forced alignment for phoneme segmentation in Quranic recitation. IEEE Access, 12, 18765–18780. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3345843

Borràs-Comes, J., Roseano, P., Vanrell, M. M., Chen, A., & Prieto, P. (2019). Epistemic intonation and epistemic gesture are mutually co-expressive. Journal of Pragmatics, 152, 72–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.07.009

Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. SAGE Publications.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2011). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Fatimah, A. C., & Arifuddin. (2018). Prosodi qirā’ah sabʻah pada Surah Al-Fātichah: Kajian fonetik akustik. CMES (Center of Middle Eastern Studies), 11(1). https://doi.org/10.20961/cmes.11.1.26010

Gade, A. M. (2004). Perfection makes practice: Learning, emotion, and the recited Quran in Indonesia. University of Hawai‘i Press.

Graham, W. A. (1993). Beyond the written word: Oral aspects of scripture in the history of religion. Cambridge University Press.

Grønnum, N. (2009). A Danish phonetically annotated spontaneous speech corpus (DanPASS). Speech Communication, 51(7), 594–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2008.11.002

Hellmuth, S. (2022). Sentence prosody and register variation in Arabic. Languages, 7(2), 129. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7020129

McKinnon, S. (2016). TBLT instructional effects on tonal alignment and pitch range in L2 Spanish imperatives versus declaratives. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39(2), 261–286. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263116000164

Meliyani, A. R., Al Farisi, M. Z., & Maulani, H. (2024). An acoustic analysis of the stress on the particle مَا /maː/ in Quranic recitation by non-Arab speakers. Language Literacy: Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Language Teaching, 8(2), 802–813. https://doi.org/10.30743/ll.v8i2.10407

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. SAGE Publications.

Mitchell, R. L. C. (2006). How does the brain mediate interpretation of incongruent auditory emotions? European Journal of Neuroscience, 24(12), 3611–3618. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.05189.x

Mujab, S. (2011). Ilmu nagham: Kaidah seni baca al-Qur’an. STAIN Kudus.

Nasution, A. S. A. (2012). Fonetik & fonologi Alquran. Amzah.

Nelson, K. (2001). The art of reciting the Quran. American University in Cairo Press.

Prieto, P. (2015). Intonational meaning. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 6(4), 371–381. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1352

Quṭb, S. (1992). Fī ẓilāl al-Qurʾān (Vol. 6). Dār al-Shurūq.

Roettger, T. B., & Grice, M. (2019). The tune drives the text. Language Dynamics and Change, 9(2), 265–298. https://doi.org/10.1163/22105832-00902006

Rota, G., Sitaram, R., Veit, R., Erb, M., Weiskopf, N., Dogil, G., & Birbaumer, N. (2007). Processing of inconsistent emotional information: An fMRI study. Experimental Brain Research, 195(4), 535–547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-008-1651-2

Shihab, M. Q. (2002). Tafsir al-Miṣbāḥ (Vol. 15). Lentera Hati.

Supriyadi, T., Julia, J., & Firdaus, E. (2019). Phonological interference in reciting Al-Qur’an. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(6), 46–77. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.9.3

Thoyib, I. M. (2019). Fonologi bahasa Arab: Struktur bahasa Arab modern. Yrama Widya.

Tomasello, R., Kim, Y., Dreyer, F. R., Grisoni, L., & Pulvermüller, F. (2022). Instantaneous neural processing of communicative functions conveyed by speech prosody. Cerebral Cortex, 32(21), 4885–4901. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhab522

Usman, S., Thonthowi, T., & Musthofa, T. (2022). Pause (mafsāl) analysis using audio Praat application in Shaikh Dr. Malik Husain Sya‘ban’s lecture. Insyirah: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa Arab dan Studi Islam, 5(2), 149–159. https://doi.org/10.26555/insyirah.v5i2.6133

Watson, J. C. E. (2002). The phonology and morphology of Arabic. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198241270.001.0001

Downloads

Published

2026-08-17

How to Cite

Ahid Ilham Zulfiqar, Diyan Rifky Ramdhani, & Lina Marlina. (2026). Phonemic Hermeneutics of Eschatological Intonation in Sūrat Al-Qiyāmah Recitation. International Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences (IJHESS), 6(1). https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v6i1.2418