Assessing Constitutional Court Independence After Controversial Rulings in Political Arena

Mokh. Thoif; Tutik Asmorowati

doi:10.55227/ijhess.v5i4.2213

Authors

Mokh. Thoif Universitas Sunan Bonang Tuban, East Java, Indonesia
Tutik Asmorowati Universitas Sunan Bonang Tuban, East Java, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v5i4.2213

Keywords:

constitutional court, legal legitimacy, judicial politicization, judicial independence, discourse analysis

Abstract

This study investigates how judicial independence is discursively constructed and contested following controversial rulings by Indonesia’s Constitutional Court. Drawing on theories of legal realism, neo-institutionalism, and discourse analysis, the research explores whether formal guarantees of judicial autonomy hold symbolic weight amid growing perceptions of political alignment. Using a qualitative case study approach, data were collected through semi-structured interviews with legal scholars, civil society actors, and journalists, complemented by discourse analysis of court rulings and media texts. Findings reveal that the Court’s independence is widely framed as situational, with legitimacy perceived to fluctuate based on alignment with dominant political interests. Respondents highlighted themes of strategic judicial reasoning, media-driven delegitimization, and performative institutional responses, suggesting that public trust is shaped less by institutional design and more by narrative coherence and interpretive transparency. Rather than neutral arbiters, courts are increasingly viewed as political actors embedded within broader struggles for power. The study contributes to literature on judicial politicization and democratic resilience by emphasizing the role of discourse in shaping perceptions of legality and legitimacy. It also offers practical insights for reform, including the need for transparent appointments and greater communicative accountability. The findings suggest that in hybrid regimes, judicial independence must be understood not only as a structural condition but as an ongoing, contested performance shaped by elite discourse, public critique, and symbolic legitimacy.

References

Araya, I. A., Hughes, M. M., & Pérez‐Liñán, A. (2020). Judicial Reshuffles and Women Justices in Latin America. American Journal of Political Science, 65(2), 373–388. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12543

Aydın-Çakır, A. (2023). Duration of the Constitution-Making Process as an Indicator of Post-Constitutional Political Uncertainty: The Insurance Theory Revisited. Global Constitutionalism, 12(2), 298–325. https://doi.org/10.1017/s2045381722000302

Ben-Natan, S. (2021). Self-Proclaimed Human Rights Heroes: The Professional Project of Israeli Military Judges. Law & Social Inquiry, 46(3), 755–787. https://doi.org/10.1017/lsi.2020.39

Bochsler, D., & Juon, A. (2021). Power-Sharing and the Quality of Democracy. European Political Science Review, 13(4), 411–430. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1755773921000151

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). In Research Defign: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed M ethods Approaches. Sage Publications.

Dahl, M. (2024). Chain Novel, or Markov Chain? Estimating the Authority of U.S. Supreme Court Case Law. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 21(4), 861–898. https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12401

Hasim, F. (2024). Constitutional Court Ruling Number 90/Puu-Xxi/2023 Regarding Aspects of Human Rights. Ays, 1(2), 121–134. https://doi.org/10.61397/ays.v1i2.98

Heaton, D., Nichele, E., Clos, J., & Fischer, J. E. (2023). “The Algorithm Will Screw You”: Blame, Social Actors and the 2020 a Level Results Algorithm on Twitter. Plos One, 18(7), e0288662. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288662

Hutchinson, T., & Duncan, N. (2012). Defining and Describing What We Do: Doctrinal Legal Research. Deakin Law Review, 17(1), 83. https://doi.org/10.21153/dlr2012vol17no1art70

Jiang, Y., & Zhang, N. (2023). A Quantitative Evaluation of Judicial Justice in Civil Cases With Chinese Free Trade Zone Enterprises as the Plaintiff. Heliyon, 9(2), e13344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13344

Kisska‐Schulze, K., Holden, J. T., & Ciocchetti, C. (2023). Brute Force (Anti) Federalism. American Business Law Journal, 60(3), 481–540. https://doi.org/10.1111/ablj.12231

Krisprimandoyo, D. A., & Mahargiono, P. B. (2023). The Influence of Fiscal Policy and Monetary Policy on Economic Growth in Indonesia. 6(2), 157–166.

Kurnia, T. S. (2022). Menguji Ketangguhan Realisme: Kritik Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 14/Puu-Xi/2013 Pasca Pemilu Serentak 2019. Jurnal Konstitusi, 19(1), 97. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1915

Kurniawati, D. (2022). The Perspectives of Legal Progressivism Concerning Song Royalty Payments. Syiah Kuala Law Journal, 6(3), 270–283. https://doi.org/10.24815/sklj.v6i3.27337

Malkopoulou, A., & Moffitt, B. (2023). How Not to Respond to Populism. Comparative European Politics, 21(6), 848–865. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-023-00341-9

Menéndez, I. V. (2021). Amending by Interpreting: The Constitutional Jurisdiction as Amendment Power. International Journal of Human Rights and Constitutional Studies, 8(1/2), 65. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijhrcs.2021.113757

Monciunskaite, B. (2022). The Risks to Judicial Independence in Latvia: A View Eighteen Years Since EU Accession. Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.3935/cyelp.18.2022.482

Murtadho, N. A. (2024). Paradigm for the Recruitment of Supreme Court Judges by the House of Representatives Is Part of Constitutional Political Intervention. JLPH, 4(4), 462–480. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v4i4.394

Nggilu, N. M., Ismail, D. E., Sulistyowati, T., & Moha, M. R. (2023). Constitutional Crisis: Intensifying Disobedience to the Decisions of the Indonesian Constitutional Court. Revista Chilena De Derecho, 50(2), 115–132. https://doi.org/10.7764/r.502.5

Petrov, J. (2024). How to Detect Abusive Constitutional Practices. European Constitutional Law Review, 20(2), 191–221. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1574019624000142

Priel, D. (2024). The Legal Realists on Political Economy. Law & Social Inquiry, 49(4), 2350–2379. https://doi.org/10.1017/lsi.2024.20

Reinold, T. (2023). How to ‘Make Law Count’: Lessons From the Comisión Internacional Contra La Impunidad en Guatemala (CICIG) for the Effectiveness of Hybrid Governance. International Journal of Law in Context, 19(4), 540–558. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1744552323000241

Restrepo, A. F. M., & Giraldo, L. D. P. (2023). Collective Choice and Dissenting Opinions in Multimember Courts - Elements for Assessing Judicial Reasoning in Courts of Constitutional Decision Making in South America. Estudios Constitucionales, 21(1), 142–168. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-52002023000100142

Rhamadona, S., Sufa, S., Indrasari, M., Brumadyadisty, G., & Asnawi, A. (2023). Communication Audit of Digital Entrepreneurship Academy of Human Resources Research Program and Development Agency of the BPSDMP Kominfo Surabaya in Pamekasan Region. Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Dan Inovasi Teknologi, 2(01), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.59653/jimat.v2i01.422

Skiple, J. K., Bentsen, H. L., & Hanretty, C. (2020). The Government Deference Dimension of Judicial Decision Making: Evidence From the Supreme Court of Norway. Scandinavian Political Studies, 43(4), 264–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.12176

Suandika, I. N., Usfunan, Y., Palguna, I. D. G., & Adiyaryani, N. N. (2023). The Legal Power of the Constitutional Court Decisions Remains. Journal of Social Research, 2(12), 5112–5122. https://doi.org/10.55324/josr.v2i12.1606

Sufa, S. A., Sumartias, S., Zubair, F., Perbawasari, S., & Aristi, N. (2025). Government Communications to Address Online Prostitution: Social Strategies for Awareness. Al Qalam: Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan Dan Kemasyarakatan, 19(2), 1266. https://doi.org/10.35931/aq.v19i2.4113

Suharno, S., Junaidi, A., & Zaelani, M. A. (2021). Embodying the Meaning of the Guardian of the Constitution in the Role of the Constitutional Court of Reducing Constitutions Indicated by Policy Corruption. International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences, 2(3), 592–599. https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v2i3.88

Trellová, L. (2020). Misconceived Quest for the Perfect Constitutional Court. Balkan Social Science Review, 16, 107–124. https://doi.org/10.46763/bssr2016107t