Analysis of the Procedural Controller Function on Workload at the Area Control Centre (ACC) JATSC
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v5i4.2228Keywords:
Procedural controller, workload, Air Traffic Control, ACC JATSC, communication effectivenessAbstract
This study analyzes the function of procedural controllers and its influence on workload at the Area Control Centre (ACC) within the Jakarta Air Traffic Service Centre (JATSC). Unlike radar controllers who operate with real-time visual aids, procedural controllers rely on communication, coordination, and pilot reports, resulting in a higher mental and cognitive workload. The research aims to identify how procedural control functions contribute to workload levels and how these functions can be optimized to maintain operational safety and efficiency. The study adopts a quantitative method with a descriptive-correlation approach. Data were collected through observations, semi-structured interviews, and closed-ended questionnaires using a five-point Likert scale. Respondents consisted of active Air Traffic Controllers (ATCs) at ACC JATSC, selected using purposive sampling with at least one year of work experience. Data analysis was performed using multiple linear regression to evaluate both simultaneous and partial effects of procedural control functions on workload. The findings show that high adherence to standard operating procedures (SOP), consistent application of procedures, and effective communication significantly reduce perceived workload. However, procedural controllers continue to face moderate-to-high levels of mental and physical workload due to sustained cognitive demands, communication intensity, and time pressure. The study concludes that optimizing procedural control functions serves as a protective mechanism against excessive workload, supporting safety, efficiency, and the well-being of ATC personnel at JATSC.
References
Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktik (Edisi ke-12). Rineka Cipta.
Averty, P., Collet, C., Dittmar, A., Athènes, S., & Vernet-Maury, E. (2004). Mental workload in air traffic control: an index constructed from field tests.. Aviation, space, and environmental medicine, 75 4, 333-41.
Bongo, M., & Seva, R. (2021). Effect of Fatigue in Air Traffic Controllers’ Workload, Situation Awareness, and Control Strategy. The International Journal of Aerospace Psychology, 32, 1 - 23. https://doi.org/10.1080/24721840.2021.1896951.
Eurocontrol. (2021). Challenges of air traffic controller workload management. Eurocontrol.
Fürstenau, N., & Radüntz, T. (2021). Power law model for subjective mental workload and validation through air traffic control human-in-the-loop simulation. Cognition, Technology & Work, 24, 291 - 315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-021-00681-0.
Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS 25. Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro Press.
Ibáñez-Gijón, J., Travieso, D., Navia, J., Montes, A., Jacobs, D., & Frutos, P. (2023). Experimental validation of COMETA model of mental workload in air traffic control. Journal of Air Transport Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2023.102378.
International Air Transport Association. (2023). IATA long-term passenger forecast. IATA. https://www.iata.org
International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). (2018). Annex 11: Air Traffic Services. Montreal: ICAO.
Prayogo, R. (2024). Hubungan antara beban kerja dengan kelelahan kerja pada petugas air traffic controller di Bandara Internasional Adi Soemarmo. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
Sonhaji, I., Nurhawani, A., Supardam, D., & Bunahri, R. (2024). The Influence of Trauma and Mental Workload after an Aircraft Accident/Incident on ATC Situational Awareness In Indonesia. Airman: Jurnal Teknik dan Keselamatan Transportasi. https://doi.org/10.46509/ajtk.v7i1.474.
Suárez, M., Valdés, R., Moreno, P., Jurado, R., De Frutos, P., & Comendador, V. (2024). Understanding the research on air traffic controller workload and its implications for safety: A science mapping-based analysis. Safety Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106545.
Sugiyono. (2018). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D (Edisi ke-25). Alfabeta.
Wickens, C. D., Hollands, J. G., Banbury, S., & Parasuraman, R. (2008). Engineering psychology and human performance (3rd ed.). Pearson Education.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rosa Mustika, Rahmawati Sukra, Imam Sonhaji

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.








































